Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Lee McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1970No. 28963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question before us is whether the District Judge abused his discretion in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty entered after an earlier plea of not guilty. 1 The motion was filed some 40 days after defendant entered his guilty plea and two days before he was to be sentenced. The sole ground alleged was that he was “frightened and confused” when the guilty plea was made.

The defendant correctly states that the prerequisite of “manifest injustice” imposed by Rule 32(d) Fed.R.Cr. P. applies only to withdrawing a plea after sentence. But, as defendant…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael W. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Eleas Dabdoub-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Rene ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Steve LakeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API