Leopold v. Bertram
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Chief Judge.
In 1971 the petitioners were named as defendants in a five-count action instituted in the circuit court. No demand for jury trial was made in the original complaint; no demand for jury trial was contained in the original responsive pleadings.1 The plaintiff then amended its complaint by adding Count 6, naming a new party-defendant. As to the original defendants, the issues remained the same. Thereafter, the original defendants sought to have the matter placed on the jury docket; the trial judge denied the request. This certiorari was presented, contending that the trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Mack v. 48 Vesey Street Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hollywood, Inc. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Laing v. Fidelity Broadcasting Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983