Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1992 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MaoPhail,

Doris L. Brown, Claimant, was employed by Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) as a trolley operator. She was discharged for willful misconduct by reason of a physical altercation with a passenger alleged to have occurred on May 18, 1978. Claimant was granted unemployment compensation benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) and SEPTA has appealed from that order.

The crucial finding of fact by the Board is that the Claimant had no physical altercation with a passenger on May 18,1978. Claimant’s testimony at two hearings *12be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Rodriguez v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Biggs v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Miller v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. New v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Glenn v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Carlson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API