Legal Opinion

State v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1972No. 7221SC628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant has twenty-six assignments of error. Three of these assignments of error are not brought forward in defendant’s brief, numbers 2, 9 and 21, and are therefore deemed abandoned. See Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. There was ample evidence that the defendant was operating his automobile on this occasion at a speed in excess of the posted speed limit, in a careless and reckless manner, while under the influence of intoxicating…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API