Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Meredith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2002No. 98CR212OFE; A106960Published

1DissentKistler, J.

The majority holds that no search occurred when defendant’s employer used a radio transmitter to secretly monitor her movements during the work day. Unless government employees have no constitutionally protected right against electronic surveillance in the workplace, the form of surveillance that the government employed here cannot be distinguished from the form of surveillance that the court held unconstitutional in State v. Campbell, 306 Or 157, 759 P2d 1040 (1988). Because I would hold that government employees retain a right to privacy against this form of surveillance, I respectfully…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. Mark L. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API