Legal Opinion

Claim of Schreckinger v. York Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, P. J.

This is an appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which held in effect that liability for an industrial accident should be assessed against appellants, and discharged the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Claimant suffered a sprain to his right knee and ankle as the result of an industrial accident. In treating these injuries the attending physician gave claimant a series of gold injections. As an aftermath of this treatment claimant developed jaundice and an enlargement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Claim of Breital v. HindersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Matter of Breitel v. HindersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Claim of Jacobs v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Schreckinger v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Nakoneczna v. I & L EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Claim of Manning v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Claim of Barberie v. Helmsley Spear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Claim of Markova v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Marshall v. Roth Brothers Smelting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API