Legal Opinion
Rechsteiner v. Madison Fund, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 27, 1977No. Civ. A. No. 76-293PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Conrad Rechsteiner, III (“Rechsteiner”), has filed this action under the provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Presently before the Court are several motions submitted by the defendant, Madison Fund, *501Inc. (“Madison Fund”), pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1
The amended complaint2 alleges that Rechsteiner was employed for 28 years by Madison Fund in an unspecified…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Andrew P. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Quinn v. Bowmar Publishing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.