Legal Opinion

Schoolfield v. Cogdell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.— F. H. Hbiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The original bill herein was filed on the 11th of June, 1905, for the purpose of rescinding a contract for the sale of a half interest in the growing timber on what is known as the “Pearson tract” of land on the ground of fraud. The bill alleged that W. E. Cogdell had pointed out timber as being on the land bought of Pearson which was not thereon, and that Schoolfield has paid $1,000. He further alleged that L. L. Pearson had a lien on the land for about $7,000 purchase money which *621■would be due some time in December, 1905, and that a •deed of trust bad been given to secure the same. It was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. OwensTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Reed Fertilizer Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bridges v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Reeves v. JohnTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McClurg v. McSpaddenTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co. v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re Village Green I, GPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Grannis-Blair Audit Co. v. MadduxTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API