Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 12, 2009No. 27250-8-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 RCW 4.84.250 relevantly provides that attorney fees are available to a prevailing party in cases “where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party ... is [$10,000] or less.” We must decide whether plaintiff Traci Pierson pleaded a claim in excess of $10,000 through her response to an interrogatory requesting a statement of damages pursuant to RCW 4.28.360. We hold that she did and affirm.

Schultheis, C.J.

*300FACTS

¶2 Ms. Pierson was injured in a car accident on May 27, 2003 when Amoldo Hernandez failed to stop for a red light and rear-ended her vehicle. Ms. Pierson filed a complaint for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Wagg v. Estate of DunhamWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wagg v. Estate of DunhamWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Beckmann v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Kovacs v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kovacs v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API