Legal Opinion

Hollis Jordan v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1973No. 72-2995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Hollis Jordan, a Texas prisoner in the respondent-appellee Dr. Beto’s custody by virtue of a state court conviction in De Witt County, Texas for passing a forged instrument as true, was denied habeas corpus relief by the district court below.

Prior to applying to the court below Jordan exhausted state remedies available to him when he unsuccessfully sought habeas relief from his Texas trial court and from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Relief was denied by the state courts without a hearing. 1 Sensitive to the requirements of Townsend v. Sain, 1963, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricon v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Ricon v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API