Legal Opinion

Dalton v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 4, 1988No. 1129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Taxpayers, Wallace B. and Shirley B. Dalton, sued to recover taxes paid under protest. The trial judge ruled the South Carolina Tax Commission did not have to refund the tax. We affirm.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether interest paid on loans used to purchase real estate rental property out-of-state is deductible from state income.

Because Judge Moore’s order eruditely sets forth and disposes of this issue, we adopt and publish his order, as modified and supplemented, as the view of this court. The modifications and supplements are reflected by either ellipses or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emerson Electric Co. v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. Avco Corp. v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Seward v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Bass v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Emerson Electric Co. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API