Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Although the two key witnesses against defendant both had extensive criminal histories and at the time of trial were fac*397ing unresolved criminal charges, the jury was fully informed of all of the relevant facts, including those relating to any plea arrangement, and we see no reason to disturb its determination. A jury’s determination of credibility must be accorded "great deference * * * and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous and so plainly unjustified by the evidence that rejection is required in the interest of justice”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. BranchNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. CorporanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. McConvilleNew York Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API