Legal Opinion

State v. Petersen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C2-84-2017PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellant Tami Petersen was convicted by a jury of D.W.I., Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (1984). On appeal, she contends the trial court committed reversible error in employing a jury selection method which deviated from the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and unreasonably restricted voir dire by limiting counsel to five minutes examination of prospective jurors. We reverse and remand for new trial.

FACTS

Appellant’s misdemeanor trial for D.W.I. began on November 6, 1984. After impaneling fourteen prospective jurors, the trial court conducted a voir dire of the panel. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Conner v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Dickinson v. LindstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State of Minnesota v. Elvis Joko PorteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API