Lightfoot v. Southeastern Liquid Fertilizer Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
1. The defendant in error raises the question that the bill of exceptions should be dismissed for lack of proper service. However, the record reveals that counsel for the defendant in error signed the following acknowledgment within 10 days after the bill of exceptions was certified and filed: “Due and legal service is hereby acknowledged on the within and foregoing bill of exceptions, copy and all other and further service is hereby waived.” This acknowledgment of service is sufficient to give jurisdiction to this court. Stewart Oil Co. v. Schell, 212 Ga. 459 (93 S. E. 2d 700).
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Riddle v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Steinmetz v. ChambleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Daniel v. Dalton News Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. NutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Blanton v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Kane v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF KENTUCKYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Pendry v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Rothberg v. Charles H. Hardin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.