Carreau v. Chapotel

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

In the lower court there was judgment maintaining the several exceptions of defendants’, to-wit: Misjoinder of parties, *851vagueness, indefiniteness, inconsistent and contrary demands, etc., and it also dismissed the suit as to Mrs. Chapotel, as of non-suit, and required the plaintiff to so' amend his petition as to preserve only one cause of action, and further required him to elect whether his demand should be for a money judgment or for the possession of the property sued for, or in the alternative that his suit be dismissed.

It is from this…