Legal Opinion

Gardell v. Cincinnati Street Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1949No. 7062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HILDEBRANT, J.:

Plaintiff was injured in a collision between the automobile in which she was seated and one of defendant’s street cars. On trial, on the question of damages alone the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, upon which a judgment was pro forma entered.

On defendant’s motion for new trial, duly filed, the following entry, entitled “Entry Setting Aside Judgment and Ordering New Trial” was journalized:—

“This cause coming on to be heard upon the defendant’s motion for new trial and the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of decision on motion for new trial, was argued by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. All City Home Improvement Co. v. MurrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API