Legal Opinion

Fullam v. Kronman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Gr. Albert, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, judgment is granted in favor of the respondents dismissing the petition.

The petitioner prays for a judgment “that the undated decision of the Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Lattingtown be declared null and void and set aside and that petitioner’s plat be approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 179-k of the Village Law.” It is his contention that he presented an application for final approval of the partitioning of premises; that a hearing was held by the respondents on May 20, 1966, and that the written decision…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Fullam v. KronmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Landing Estates, Inc. v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API