Trigg v. Riebold
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.
Plaintiff instituted action and obtained judgment against defendants on a promissory note in the amount of $95,000.00 plus interest and attorney fees. Defendants have perfected this appeal on the ground that the note sued on was given without consideration; that the plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof resting upon him; and that the court erred in determining otherwise.
The record discloses that over a period of time plaintiff and defendants had been engaged in some rather complicated dealings involving advances of money and borrowing from banks, and that upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hutchison v. BoneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Chesher v. Shafter Lake Clay Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange Ex Rel. Hiram C. Gardner, Inc. v. ValdezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Brock v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Will of SkardaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970