Legal Opinion

Trigg v. Riebold

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1968No. 8578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOISE, Justice.

Plaintiff instituted action and obtained judgment against defendants on a promissory note in the amount of $95,000.00 plus interest and attorney fees. Defendants have perfected this appeal on the ground that the note sued on was given without consideration; that the plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof resting upon him; and that the court erred in determining otherwise.

The record discloses that over a period of time plaintiff and defendants had been engaged in some rather complicated dealings involving advances of money and borrowing from banks, and that upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. BoneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chesher v. Shafter Lake Clay Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange Ex Rel. Hiram C. Gardner, Inc. v. ValdezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Brock v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Will of SkardaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Baca v. BurksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API