MacAlister v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
Petitioner herein prays that we issue the writ of mandate to require the councilmen of the city of Los Angeles to recognize him as a’duly appointed councilman. Our alternative writ heretofore issued and the councilmen have appeared by demurrer and by return.
Under charter provisions the city of Los Angeles is geographically divided into fifteen districts, and the legislative body designated as the council is composed of one *185councilman for each district. Nowhere in the charter is it specifically required that the councilman for a district shall reside in such district, although the election…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- State ex rel. Coogan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- State ex rel. Burdick v. TyrrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Conger v. GilmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Draper v. State ex rel. PatilloSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re GovernorshipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. CurbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Opinion No. (2006), California Attorney General Reports2006
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2019