Legal Opinion

Leask v. Kijakazi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01817Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMANTHA ALEXANDRIA LEASK, : Civil No. 1:23-CV-1817 Plaintiff, : v. : (Chief Magistrate Judge Bloom) FRANK BISIGNANO, : Commissioner of Social Security, : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction This case comes before us on a motion for attorneys’ fees filed by the plaintiff, Samantha Leask. (Doc. 23). Leask has moved to release a portion of her past due Social Security benefits directly to her attorney, pursuant to their contingent fee agreement and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The funds in question were withheld by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. ROTHENBECKER v. AstrueDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Berlanga v. Terrier Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API