Legal Opinion

Franco v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 21, 2007No. 288, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

Nicole Franco (“Franco”), the defendant-below, appeals from a Superior Court restitution order. She claims that by precluding her defense counsel from impeaching the State’s witness on cross examination, the Superior Court reversibly erred in two respects. Specifically, Franco contends that the trial court violated Franco’s confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment and under the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We find no merit to these claims and affirm.

FACTS

In 2005, Franco, together with three codefendants, was arrested on charges of first degree robbery…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. People v. VasseurColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Box v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. State v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. Jeremy Frank JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API