Davis v. Davis

MARVIN, Judge.

The divorced husband appeals a judgment rejecting his demands to reduce permanent alimony because the wife sold the former family home after the divorce and invested the proceeds in an interest bearing account which increased her income approximately $4,800 per year. Appellant contends that the trial judge erred in finding this was not a sufficient change in circumstances which would warrant reducing permanent alimony. CC Art. 160. We find no error and affirm.

The litigants were divorced June 10, 1981, after 37 years of marriage. Appellant was found at fault and he consented to…