Legal Opinion

Razorsoft, Inc. v. Maktal, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1995No. 84,090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GARRETT, Chief Judge:

Appellee, Razorsoft, Inc. (Razorsoft), an Oklahoma corporation, sued Appellant, Mak-tal, Inc., d/b/a Park Place Productions (Mak-tal), Appellants, Michael A. Knox and Richard Knox, Sr. (the Knoxes) individually, Troy Lyndon (Lyndon). John Smedley (Smedley) and Knight Technologies (Knight) for breach of contract, 1 fraud, consequential damages and punitive damages. The alleged damages were unliquidated. Maktal and Knight are California corporations. The Knoxes, Lyndon and Smedley are residents of California. Summons was served on Maktal and the Knoxes in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Yery v. YerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
Farmers' Union Co-Operative Royalty Co. v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
State National Bank v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
Roberts v. Jack Richards Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Moore v. GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001