Goetz v. Howland
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This is an action to recover money. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
*2The suit was filed against C. H. Howland and Charles Howland, partners, doing business as the Commodore Pool Hall. The petition alleged in the first place that they were partners. At the time of trial the court permitted an amendment by adding the words “or Charles Howland held himself out as a partner.”
The bill sued on was for soft drinks furnished the pool hall by plaintiff. There is no dispute as to the indebtedness of the pool hall or as to the amount of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rizer v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Craig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- John Deere Plow Co. v. KlaurensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Phillip Van Heusen, Inc. v. KornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Harris v. Oil Reclaiming Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000