Legal Opinion

Goetz v. Howland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1934No. 30,904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to recover money. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

*2The suit was filed against C. H. Howland and Charles Howland, partners, doing business as the Commodore Pool Hall. The petition alleged in the first place that they were partners. At the time of trial the court permitted an amendment by adding the words “or Charles Howland held himself out as a partner.”

The bill sued on was for soft drinks furnished the pool hall by plaintiff. There is no dispute as to the indebtedness of the pool hall or as to the amount of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rizer v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. John Deere Plow Co. v. KlaurensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Phillip Van Heusen, Inc. v. KornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Harris v. Oil Reclaiming Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API