Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 15, 1936No. 8441PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

This is a rule 37 (oil well spacing rule) case. It involves the validity of a permit to drill a well upon a .077-acre tract in the town of London, in the East Texas oil field. Ownership of the segregated tract antedates promulgation of rule 37; and the issue of voluntary segregation subsequently to application of the rule is therefore not involved. The tract is triangular in form. Its north, east, and south lines are 80.4, 62.4, and 18.1 feet, respectively. Its west line is the center of a public street and is 85.5 feet long. On the north and east it is bounded by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nash v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Dailey v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Railroad Commission v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Halbouty v. DarseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API