Legal Opinion
Arney v. Central Electric & Gas Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 5, 1946No. 1464PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
It is urged that there is no jurisdiction because the cause of action arose in the State of South Dakota; that the defendant is a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Minnesota and service upon it was obtained by serving its agent appointed in compliance with the foreign corporation law of this State. Minn.St.1941, § 303.01 et seq. It is contended that jurisdiction, therefore, was not obtained when the cause of action arose in a State other than the State of Minnesota. Defendant also contends that the dismissal should be granted because its agent resides…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mary M. Knowlton v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., and Schick Movers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Guy F. Atkinson Company v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958
- Antonana v. Ore Steamship CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Gibson v. United States LinesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1947