Legal Opinion

Durham v. Maratta

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 18, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op tiie Court by

Yan Sant, Commissioner

—Reversing.

The appeal is from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant below, Hattie E. Maratta, at the direction of the Court at the conclusion of the testimony introduced by plaintiff below, Pearl Durham. The sole' question for our determination is whether the evidence was sufficient to require the Court to submit the case to the jury.

The suit is to recover damages - for injuries sustained by appellant in falling on steps maintained by appellee for the common use of her tenants, including…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seelbach, Inc. v. MellmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Rodgers v. StollerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hargis v. BaizeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Blue Grass Restaurant Company v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Greyhound Terminal of Louisville, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Blue Grass Restaurant Company v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Hargis v. BaizeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API