Legal Opinion
Walton v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1913No. Civ. No. 1347PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The following contract was entered into at the date set out therein between defendant Davis, who was doing business under the name of the Imperial Creamery Co., and T. A. Cox:
“An Agreement for the Hauling of Cream, figured as Butter Fat.
“This agreement entered into this the 17th day of December, 1909, between the Imperial Creamery Co., hereinafter known as the party °of the first part, and T. A. Cox, hereinafter known as the party of the second part.
“ Witnesseth: That the party…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Buckley v. Shell Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Coykendall v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Luce v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953