Legal Opinion

Gallipo v. City of Rutland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 16, 1994No. 91-320Published

1Opinion of the Court

656 A.2d 635 (1994)

Raymond F. GALLIPO

v.

CITY OF RUTLAND, Fire Chief Gerald Lloyd, and Gerald Lancour.

No. 91-320.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 16, 1994.

Andrew Jackson, Middlebury, for plaintiff-appellant.

Samuel Hoar, Jr., and Susan J. Flynn of Dinse, Erdmann & Clapp, Burlington, for defendants-appellees.

Before GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ., and PECK, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

GIBSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Raymond F. Gallipo appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants City of Rutland and Rutland Fire Chief Gerald Lloyd, and the denial of his motion to disqualify the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API