Legal Opinion

In re Radley Steel Const. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 20, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Bankruptcy proceedings of the Radley Steel Construction Company. On motion to direct the Mutual Bank to pay over a deposit to the credit of the bankrupt.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The receiver has. made a motion to direct the Mutual Bank to pay over a certain sum which was on deposit to the credit of the bankrupt on the day when the petition in bankruptcy was filed. The bank has resisted this motion, appearing specially, and contests the jurisdiction of the court. It claims that it is retaining, and has a right to retain, the money in its possession, for a purpose alleged to be within its rights, and that its refusal to pay the same over to the receiver can be tested, only in an action brought in a court having plenary jurisdiction to hear the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. TownshendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Wilson v. Citizens' Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
  3. Twentieth Street Bank v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. In re Middletown Packing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API