Legal Opinion
Drinkard v. Embalmers Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 30, 1943No. 8 Div. 213PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal is upon the record proper, and presents but a single question, the propriety of the trial court's action in overruling defendants' demurrers to plaintiff's replication numbered 3 to defendants' plea numbered 4.
The suit is against E. L. Drinkard, B. T. Howell, and William H. Drinkard, Jr., doing business under the name and style of the Drinkard-Howell Funeral Company (or Home). Recovery against William H. Drinkard, Jr., was denied, and a judgment discharging him was entered.
The complaint consists of two counts. Count one claims on account, and count two claims the purchase price of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hobbs v. Massasoit Whip Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. HouppertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. YassineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. v. BargerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Harold Allen's Mobile Home Factory Outlet, Inc. v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Anderson v. AshbySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ledbetter v. Frosty Morn MeatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.