Legal Opinion

Texas Irr. Co. v. Moore, Bryan & Perry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Wells Thompson, Judge. Action by the Texas Irrigation Company against Moore, Bryan & Perry, a partnership, in which J. W. Magill and another intervened. There was a judgment for defendants as against plaintiff on its claim and against them on their cross-action, and in favor of the interveners, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit-for $2,800,-in-stituted by appellant against the partnership of Moore, Bryan & Perry, composed of A. A. Moore, W. Joel Bryan, -and M. S. Perry, alleged to be due by virtue of a contract, whereby appellant agreed to furnish water for irrigation purposes, and.appellees agreed to pay for the same at the rate of $7 an acre for all land ree’eiving the water. Appellees Moore, Bryan & Perry answered by general and special exceptions and general denial, and set up a cross-action against appellant, alleging damages arising from a failure on its part to furnish water as agreed to in the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API