Legal Opinion

Burgess v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 25, 2019No. 8:19-cv-03055Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION Charles Antoine Burgess, ) Civil Action No. 8:19-cv-03055-RMG Plaintiff, V. ORDER AND OPINION United States, Defendant. a) Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 6) recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. For the reasons set forth below, the Court adopts the R & R as the order of the Court and the action is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Feller v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Ralph R. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API