Legal Opinion

Novak v. Woodin (In Re Woodin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 2, 2003No. 19-30315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

ISSUE

A

The question for decision is whether the plaintiff Chapter 7 trustee is foreclosed from pursuing a fraudulent property transfer action against the transferee-defendant because the trustee failed to timely object to the debtor’s claimed homestead exemption of the property she transferred pre-petition. The short answer is “no,” on the two bases separately set out in sections IV. A and B, infra.

B

The defendant raises the issue in his motion for summary judgment (“the motion”) in his favor. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robert A. Mercer, Jr., Debtor v. Jason Monzack, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Moldo v. Clark (In Re Clark)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re PageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re De HertoghUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  2. In Re SbriglioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  3. In re ConleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. In re GillenwaterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
  5. In re SchmittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API