Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. Haller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2017No. 2016-CA-24PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Petitioners-appellants, Tressa Sherrod, individually and as executrix of the Estate of John H. Crawford, III; John Crawford, Jr.; and LeeCee Johnson, next friend of two minors, appeal from the trial court's dismissal of their Petition for Limited Release of Grand Jury Transcript (the "Petition"). Appellants argue that the trial court erred by "improperly bas [ing] its decision wholly on a mere recitation of the general benefits of not disclosing grand jury testimony" and a "speculative, irrelevant belief or hope" that they will eventually be able to obtain essentially the same…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Petition for Disclosure of Evidence Presented to Franklin County Grand Juries in 1970Ohio Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newman v. Univ. of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Boyd v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Hurley v. Nifty 50 TavernOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Williams v. Dayton WaterOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Bierly v. Kettering Health NetworkOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API