Rorick v. Railway Officials' & Employees' Acc. Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. .
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the court below, is the beneficiary named in an accident policy of insurance issued by the defendant in error upon the life of the husband of the plaintiff in error, David G. Rorick, by occupation a passenger train conductor, insuring him against “physical bodily injury resulting in disability or death, as hereinafter (in the policy) expressed, and which shall be effected while this contract is in force, solely by reason of and through external, violent, and accidental means, within the terms and conditions of this contract, and…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.