Legal Opinion
HAVENS ET UX v. Woodfill
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1971No. 1070A175, 6, 7 Â ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, C.J.
This appeal arises from the overruling of defendants-appellants’ motion to correct errors. Plaintiff-appellee initiated the action requesting a declaratory judgment that certain promissory notes bearing an interest rate of 9% were not usurious under the applicable statute.
*368Acts 1969, ch. 106, § 1, p. 248, Ind. Stat. Anno., § 19-12-101, Burns’ 1970 Cum. Supp., reads as follows:
“Legal rates of interest on loans or forbearances. — The interest on loans or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action, shall be as follows:(a) When the parties do not agree on the rate, interest shall be at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Allen Etc. v. Van Buren Township Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Sidney M. Massie, Individually, and Sidney M. Massie, as Executive Officer and Trustee of Massie Development Company v. Rose RubinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Simmons v. PatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- In The Matter Of Jules B. Leblanc, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bradburn v. County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Holthouse Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.