Legal Opinion

Silberfeld v. Solomon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1920No. 8379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for the conversion of property. Judgment for defendants. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tellee

The plaintiff in error, a diamond merchant of New York, brought suit against the defendants in error, pawnbrokers in Denver, to recover the value of certain diamonds alleged to have belonged to the plaintiff and to have been converted by the defendants to their own use and benefit. The defendants had judgment, and the case is before us on error.

Plaintiff’s claim is that he delivered the diamonds in question to one Lester, a salesman of jewelry “on memorandum,” that being a term used in the jewelry trade, covering a consignment .of goods, on a written memorandum, to be sold, the consignee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. Morsch v. LessigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KohlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Tom W. Carpenter Equipment Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. General Electric Credit Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Panhandle Pipe & Supply Co. v. SW Pressey & SonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Rosenthal v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Avis Rent-A-Car System v. WoelfelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API