Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 4, 2001No. CV 97-2608(ADS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

Petitioner Marc Ramirez (the “petitioner” or “Ramirez”) commenced this habeas coiyus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Specifically, the petitioner moves to vacate his conviction and sentence, or, in the alternative, “to order a new sentencing hearing based upon newly developed case law.” Initially, the petitioner was repre sented by counsel, Kevin M. Schad, Esq. of Cincinnati, Ohio. However, some time in late 2000, Schad no longer represented the petitioner because of financial considerations. The petitioner is now proceeding pro…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  2. Vega v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API