Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bickart

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 2016No. Nos. 15-2890, 15-2946PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Clark and Jerlene Bickart were convicted for tax fraud for submitting a falsified tax return supported by fabricated 1099-OID forms. The Bickarts challenge the imposition of the sophisticated means sentencing enhancement as well as their conditions of supervised release. For the following reasons, we vacate the third-party notification condition of Jerlene Bickart’s supervised release and remand for resen-tencing. We affirm defendants’ sentences and remaining conditions of supervised release in all other respects.

*835I. Background

On May 4, 2009, Jerlene Bickart, with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Kenneth P. Kontny and Joann L. KontnyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Charles ArmourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Karl C. SchaveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Carey RayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Bruce JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Chad GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API