People v. Pealer
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Smith, J. (concurring).
I join Judge Graffeo’s majority opinion, and add this concurrence to reply to the dissent.
I concede that my dissenting colleague has a point; like him, I am uncomfortable with what happened in this case. It presents an extreme example of the opportunities given to law enforcement officers by the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Whren v United States (517 US 806 [1996]), and ours in People v Robinson (97 NY2d 341 [2001]), that a traffic stop made with probable cause may not be challenged as pretextual—i.e., that the motive for the stop is irrelevant. Here, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.