Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Pealer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2013Published

1Concurrence

Smith, J. (concurring).

I join Judge Graffeo’s majority opinion, and add this concurrence to reply to the dissent.

I concede that my dissenting colleague has a point; like him, I am uncomfortable with what happened in this case. It presents an extreme example of the opportunities given to law enforcement officers by the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Whren v United States (517 US 806 [1996]), and ours in People v Robinson (97 NY2d 341 [2001]), that a traffic stop made with probable cause may not be challenged as pretextual—i.e., that the motive for the stop is irrelevant. Here, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API