Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00973Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES WILLIAM PEARSON, JR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00973 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Nearly nine years ago, Plaintiff Charles Pearson, Jr. (“Pearson”) first sought disability benefits, and now, for the third time, seeks review of the denial of those benefits. Pearson brings this action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g), for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harold MASON, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.