Legal Opinion

State v. Camarillo

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1989No. 17567PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal comes to us from an order denying a motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence under Idaho Criminal Rule 35. Sammy Camarillo is serving a twenty-year indeterminate sentence for second degree murder, enhanced by an additional indeterminate period of ten years for using a firearm during commission of the crime. The sole issue is whether the sentence imposed was illegal because the district judge characterized the ten-year enhancement as a “consecutive” sentence. Although we disapprove of this terminology, we hold that it does not render the sentence illegal.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MoneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. VegaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. SaykhamchoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlsaneaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Sivak v. Ada CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Freeman v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. BarrIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Lopez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API