Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Meserve

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1873Published

On REPORT. Writ op dower. The facts appear in the opinion. cited Davol v. Howland, 14-Mass. 219; Harding v. Alden, 9 Groenl. 151; Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, §§ 665, 739.

1Opinion of the CourtVirgiN, J.

This is an action of dower bj the plaintiff who was the wife of one Reuben G. Meserve from June 15, 1860, when they were married, until August, 1870, when a divorce was decreed to her for the fault of her husband.

The case comes before us on report; and such a judgment is to be entered as the law and evidence require.

It is admitted that a legal demand was made at least one month before the date of the writ; that the defendant was seised i i tec; o the premises at the time the demand was made; and that Reuben G. Meserve was seised of the premises during the coverture.

The defendant contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davol v. HowlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  2. Stilphen v. HoudletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API