Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Burman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a delivery truck driver when he demanded a raise of $50 per week. The employer informed claimant that his demand could not be met but that he would be given a raise of $25 per week. Claimant rejected this offer and immediately quit his employment. He subsequently applied for unemployment insurance benefits stating on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KerrsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CuttittoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of BratmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API