Legal Opinion

King v. King

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is an action for absolute divorce. The defendant has not appeared or answered. The cause was referred to *751an official referee to hear and report. The official referee has recommended that an interlocutory judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiff.

In the instant case the summons and verified complaint were personally served on the defendant on January 10, 1948; the affidavit of regularity shows that defendant has not appeared, answered or otherwise moved and that his time to do so has not been extended by stipulation, order of the court, or otherwise, and that no motion addressed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 444 W. 54th Street Tenants Assocs. v. CostelloCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API