Constitutionality of Disparate-Impact Liability Under Title VII
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
1Opinion of the Court
(Slip Opinion) Constitutionality of Disparate-Impact Liability Under Title VII EEOC’s Title VII guidelines are unconstitutional because they contemplate liability based on disparate effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, and pressure employers to engage in race-based decisionmaking. Properly understood, disparate-impact liability proscribes only those practices that reflect a significant like- lihood of intentional discrimination. The business-necessity defense requires employers to demonstrate only that the chal- lenged practice rationally serves a valid business…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.