Legal Opinion
Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1939No. 9182PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appeal is taken from decrees in admiralty enforcing liens on two motorships for oil furnished such vessels by appellee.
In September, 1932, appellee entered into a contract with Anglo Canadian Shipping Co., Ltd., by which appellee agreed to sell fuel oil to any vessel which Anglo might “own, charter, operate or be agents for”. On May 19,1933, such contract was modified “to include the fuel oil requirements of any and all vessels owned, chartered and/or operated” by W. L. Comyn & Sons, hereinafter called Comyn. Subsequently, and before the ships in question were chartered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- W. A. Marshall & Co. v. S. S. "President Arthur"Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- The Golden GateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Importers S. S. Co. v. Houston Marine Engineering WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ameejee Valleejee & Sons v. M/V Victoria U.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Gardner v. The CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Lineas Aereas Colombianas Expresas v. The Travelers Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Ramsay Scarlett & Co., Inc. v. SS Koh EunDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.