Legal Opinion

Lucas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1935No. 17517Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant contends that his Bill of Exception No. 1, as set out in the original opinion, was incorrectly copied in the transcript. He attaches to the motion for rehearing a certified copy of the bill of exception, which reads as follows: “That at the time the witness, W. H. Barnett, was offered as a witness for the State of Texas, it was shown to the court and the objection duly made to said witness’ testimony by defendant for the reason that said witness had been tried and convicted of a felony for three times,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Spann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Dade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API