Legal Opinion

Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Ass'n.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 2018No. A147297Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/24/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE KAZUKO K. ARTUS, Plaintiff and Appellant, A147297 v. GRAMERCY TOWERS (San Francisco City & County CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Super. Ct. No. CGC-14-541320) Defendant and Respondent. After members of a condominium homeowner’s association (HOA) voted by a very substantial majority to eliminate the practice of cumulative voting, plaintiff Kazuko K. Artus, who owns three units in the Gramercy Towers condominium development, sued the HOA. Artus claimed, among other things,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API